Funeral Insurance Insurance Pricing Guide

What determines price for funeral insurance?

Funeral insurance occupies an unusual corner of the insurance market: a life product with fixed, low-face-amount benefits ($5,000–$25,000), sold predominantly to ages 50–85, often with minimal or zero medical underwriting. The pricing challenge is not modelling catastrophic tail risk or volatile severity—the death benefit is contractually fixed at inception. Instead, it is managing extreme adverse selection in guaranteed issue products (mortality loadings up to 75% above standard), navigating lapse-supported profit structures where a 2% lapse assumption miss can destroy 20–30% of expected margin, and building credible assumptions from portfolios too small for classical methods. This guide covers the exposure bases, rating factors, actuarial approaches, and market forces that make funeral insurance pricing distinct.

• Product architecture is the single largest rating factor. Guaranteed issue mortality can reach 175% of standard—a wider differential than age, gender, or tobacco produce individually.

• Profitability depends on policies that never claim. Typical profit models assume 40–60% of policies lapse before death; if retention improves even modestly, margins evaporate.

• Face amount is fixed and known, yet credibility is scarce. A 5,000-policy book generates roughly 150 deaths per year—far below the 1,082 claims needed for 90% Limited Fluctuation credibility.

• Graded benefit periods are the insurer's primary anti-selection tool, replacing the medical underwriting that other life products rely on.

• The SOA has suspended new mortality improvement scales through 2025, leaving actuaries without an authoritative forward view for the 65+ cohort that dominates final expense.

Exposure measures unique to funeral insurance

Funeral insurance uses face amount and policy count as exposure bases—not premium volume, payroll, property value, or any of the variable proxies common in commercial P&C lines. The reason is structural: when a policyholder dies, the insurer pays a contractually fixed dollar amount. There is no severity variability, no adjustment for actual loss, no subrogation. The pure premium calculation reduces to q(x) × face amount, making face amount the theoretically complete exposure measure.

This simplicity is a double-edged sword. Data integrity is excellent—face amount cannot be miscoded the way payroll or property values routinely are in commercial lines. But it also means there is no secondary exposure variable to refine segmentation. A $10,000 guaranteed issue policy and a $10,000 simplified issue policy have identical exposure but radically different expected mortality. The exposure base captures the financial obligation perfectly while revealing nothing about the underlying risk quality—pushing all differentiation into underwriting method and rating factors.

Rating factors that shape funeral insurance premiums

Product type and underwriting method

This is the dominant factor. The SOA 2017 Guaranteed Issue Mortality Tables—adopted by the NAIC in 2018—provide loadings of 55%, 65%, and 75% above standard mortality depending on the product design. At the 75% loading, guaranteed issue mortality runs at 175% of standard. No other single rating factor in final expense pricing produces a comparable differential.

Simplified issue products use binary health questions plus MIB prescription verification to screen out the highest-risk applicants, then apply table ratings (Standard through Table 8) to accepted lives. Guaranteed issue products eliminate all screening in exchange for graded death benefits—typically returning premium only in months 1–12, paying 50% of face in months 13–24, and full face amount from month 25 onward. The graded structure effectively replaces underwriting: instead of declining unhealthy applicants, the insurer limits early-duration exposure where anti-selection mortality peaks at 250–400% of standard.

The critical pricing insight: product type has shifted from a pricing adjustment to an architectural decision that defines the entire mortality curve. Actuaries are not applying a modifier to a base rate; they are selecting between fundamentally different mortality models.

Age at issue

Age is the primary continuous rating variable, with qx values from the SOA GI tables driving premiums directly. The age effect is steeper in funeral insurance than standard life because the target market skews older (50–85) and because anti-selection intensifies at advanced ages—SOA data shows ages 85+ running persistently 1–2 percentage points higher A/E ratios than ages 65–74 even post-pandemic.

Tobacco use

Tobacco surcharges are actuarially justified and regulatory-recognised, with differentials typically around 1.5× the non-tobacco rate. Among simplified issue products surveyed by the SOA, 70% vary mortality assumptions by tobacco status. For guaranteed issue, tobacco may not be separately rated because the graded benefit structure and universal mortality loading already absorb the differential.

Gender

The SOA GI tables provide gender-specific and gender-blended variants, reflecting mortality differentials that remain statistically significant across all ages. Gender-based rating is permitted in life insurance markets, though some carriers use blended tables for operational simplicity given the small face amounts involved.

Health status and medical history

In simplified issue products, specific conditions function as binary knock-outs rather than pricing adjustments. Advanced cancer, severe multiple sclerosis, and complicated hepatitis C trigger automatic declines. Conditions of moderate severity—controlled hypertension, stable hepatitis B, mild MS—generate continuous table ratings from Standard to Table 6–8. The same organ system can produce either outcome depending on clinical presentation: hepatitis B ranges from Standard to Table 6 to Decline based on liver function and treatment compliance.

Guaranteed issue products, by design, have no health-based knock-outs or adjustments. Every applicant receives the same rate for their age and gender, with risk managed entirely through graded benefits and elevated base mortality assumptions.

Lapse assumptions (implicit rating factor)

Lapse is not a filed rating factor, but it functions as one. Funeral insurance is inherently lapse-supported: profit projections assume a large proportion of policyholders stop paying before death. Research using Thiele's differential equation demonstrates that when experienced lapses fall just 2 percentage points below assumed (5% vs. 7% annual), expected present value of losses can exceed 20–30% of collected premiums. This makes the lapse assumption as consequential to pricing adequacy as the mortality assumption itself.

How actuaries price funeral insurance

Bühlmann credibility weighting bridges thin company experience against SOA industry tables—essential when a typical book yields only 150 annual deaths against a 1,082-claim full-credibility threshold. Duration-specific mortality table modification applies multipliers of 250–400% in policy years 1–2 tapering to 120–150% at year 3+, capturing the anti-selection arc unique to guaranteed and simplified issue products. Lapse-support stress testing at ±50% of base lapse assumptions quantifies the profit sensitivity that dominates final expense economics. Gross premium valuation calculates lifetime loss ratios (PV claims ÷ PV premiums), with product design alone creating 4-percentage-point differentials between refund and non-refund variants. VM-20 principle-based reserving applies in principle, though face amounts under $50,000 typically qualify for exclusion testing, allowing formulaic reserves that reduce compliance costs but increase reliance on appointed actuary judgement.

What's shaping funeral insurance pricing now

Post-pandemic mortality for ages 65+ has normalised to 99.2–100.6% of 2019 baselines as of mid-2024, with U.S. all-cause excess mortality falling to just 0.4% in 2024. However, when measured against pre-pandemic improvement expectations (MP-2021 scale), experience remains 1.7–3.3% adverse—meaning mortality improvement has stalled, not reversed. The SOA's decision not to release a new improvement scale through 2025, citing pandemic-disrupted data as "not predictive of future mortality," leaves actuaries without an authoritative forward projection for the age band that matters most.

On the growth side, LIMRA reported final expense new annualised premium increased 16% in 2024 across 28 reporting companies ($1.05 billion total), signalling competitive pressure on pricing adequacy. Meanwhile, ages 85+ consistently show the highest A/E ratios post-pandemic, creating adverse experience precisely where final expense portfolios concentrate. The combination of stalled improvement, suspended projection tools, and accelerating sales volume makes current assumption-setting unusually dependent on company-specific experience and actuarial judgement.

How hx supports Funeral Insurance insurance pricing

Configurable pricing logic for complex rating structures

Funeral Insurance's unique challenges require pricing logic that standard raters struggle to express. The hx Decision Engine lets actuaries implement these rules in native Python—including knockout criteria, coverage-specific calculations, and control interactions—then deploy changes with full governance and version control.

Funeral insurance requires product-specific mortality loadings that vary dramatically by underwriting method (guaranteed issue requiring 75% loadings versus simplified issue table ratings), creating pricing complexity that standard actuarial systems struggle to express. The hx Decision Engine implements these duration-dependent mortality multipliers and graded benefit structures in native Python with full actuarial governance.

Submission triage aligned to appetite

Funeral Insurance submissions arrive with documentation that determines both insurability and pricing tier. hx Submission Triage extracts this data from unstructured broker submissions and surfaces it alongside appetite checks and indicative pricing, so underwriters can identify gaps before investing time in full analysis.

Final expense carriers face severe anti-selection when simplified issue applications contain prescription history red flags (advanced cancer, severe MS) that require immediate decline versus acceptable conditions warranting Table 2-6 rate-ups. hx Submission Triage automatically routes MIB-flagged applications to specialized underwriters while sending standard health profiles through automated approval workflows.

Portfolio intelligence for aggregation management

Funeral Insurance's systemic risk requires portfolio-level visibility that policy-by-policy pricing can't provide. hx Portfolio Intelligence enables batch rating, what-if analysis, and concentration monitoring to support regulatory reporting requirements.

Lapse-supported pricing models assume 40-60% policy termination before claims, but actual lapse rate deviations of just 2% can produce 20-30% profit erosion that's invisible without portfolio-wide stress testing. hx Portfolio Intelligence aggregates experience across issue age cohorts and tests "what-if" scenarios at ±50% of base lapse assumptions to quantify profitability impact before adverse trends emerge.

Audit trails for evolving regulatory requirements

With increasing regulatory scrutiny, actuaries need documented lineage from model assumptions to individual policy pricing decisions. hx captures every action automatically, creating the governance trail Funeral Insurance's regulatory environment demands.

VM-20 compliance requires annual appointed actuary certification that graded benefit reserves reflect company-specific mortality experience, creating audit requirements that span multiple pricing iterations and assumption changes. hx maintains complete version control of mortality table modifications (150-400% loadings by duration), assumption updates, and reserve calculation methodologies with immutable audit trails for regulatory examination.

Explore hx for Funeral Insurance insurance →

This guide is part of Hyperexponential's insurance pricing resource library. For more information on how hx supports Funeral Insurance pricing, contact us.